TheEffectivenessofOralandWrittenCorrective FeedbackonStudent’sWritingAssignmentatSMA Negeri1Majene.

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Researcher : MutmainnahHadi Reg.Number : 10256119015 Title : TheEffectivenessofOralandWrittenCorrective FeedbackonStudent’sWritingAssignmentatSMA Negeri1Majene.

Thisstudyaimstodeterminewhetheroralandwrittencorrective feedbackareeffectiveinimprovingstudents'writingskillsandtoidentify whetherthereisadifferenceineffectivenessbetweenthetwo.This experimentalstudywasconducted atSMA Negeri1 Majenewith a populationof112grade11studentsdividedintotwoclasses:Mipa1as thefirstexperimentalclassandMipa2asthesecondexperimentalclass. Theresearchinstrumentsconsistedofpre-testandpost-test.Thefirst experimentalclassreceivedwrittencorrectivefeedbackwhilethesecond experimentalclassreceived oralcorrectivefeedbackontheirwriting assignments.DatawereanalyzedusingSPSS20withasignificancelevel of0.05throughpairedsamplet-testandindependentsamplet-test.The resultsofthepairedsamplet-testshowedthatbothexperimentalclasses experiencedsignificantimprovementsinwritingskills,withaSig.(2-tailed)

valueof0.000(p<0.05),indicatingasignificantdifferencebetweenpre- testandpost-testscoresinbothgroups.Thisimprovementdemonstrates

thatbothwrittenandoralcorrectivefeedbackareeffectiveinenhancing students'writing abilities.Meanwhile,theresultsoftheindependent samplet-testshowedaSig.(2-tailed)valuegreaterthan0.05,indicatingno significantdifferencebetween theeffectivenessofwritten corrective feedbackandoralcorrectivefeedback.Thesefindingsconfirm thatboth typesofcorrectivefeedbackhaveequivalentlevelsofeffectivenessin helpingstudentsimprovetheirwritingskills.Basedontheseresults,itcan beconcludedthatteacherscanusebothmethodseitherseparatelyorin combinationinwritinginstructiontomaximizestudentlearningoutcomes.

Keywords:ErrorCorrection,Writing Assesment,Learning Strategies, FeedbackTypes.